Check the scanned record

Original scanned page

Open original in a larger view

Machine-read text

Unverified · 1,997 characters

The election of officers was closed.

. Use on Review request by Millard Judd for a minimum of six (6) inclusive Multi-Family
Residential Dwellings and efficiency apartments on two lots shown as Lots 46-B and 46-
C with a combine acreage of 0.923 acres on part of Tax Map 047E Group A Parcel
021.00 located on Guthrie Road zoned B-3 Intensive Business District.

Mr. Casteel swore in Mr. Judd.

Mr. Casteel said all the background information was in the packet. These two lots were
created last year by Community Partners. They expressed _an interest in having them
zoned R-2, to be able to build homes themselves, but they went _a different way and
marketed them as B-3. They do meet the B-3 standards for lots, and it is recorded. The

main issue they have currently, and Mr. Judd is aware of it also, is the constraints on one
of those lots because it is between a gas pipeline and an extreme buffer that cannot be
varied. There is only a certain envelope. Right now, there are two lots there. Lot 46-C
cannot handle 6-inclusive units on that property. What he recommends, to not hold up the

sale, Mr. Judd will have put these together once he takes possession. The approval will be
for the new lot, not these two individual lots because he is going to need that space to do
what he wants to do. He is aware of that.

Mr. Charles asked if they were doing that rather than rezoning.

Mr. Casteel said “right”, because a Use on Review you can do multi-family. Multi-family
fits on Guthrie Road; they don’t want commercial. Guthrie is not a commercial road. He
can do this without having to rezone it.

MOTION: To accept Staff's recommendations and approve this Use
on Review, that this .923 acres approved for this particular
use.

MADE: _ John Proffitt
SECOND: _ Kenny Charles

Mr. Charles seconded that making sure it was known that
these lots have to be combined.

Mr. Casteel said this approval will be for the entire acreage
and not the individual lots.

tary

VOTE: Unanimous
MOTION PASSED