2026 7 13 Work Session PACKET Council
City Council · packet · 132 pages · Descriptive metadata inferred from filename
Extracted text for page 69
Unverified text extraction. Check the original page for numbers, names, and layout.
PUBLIC WORKS TO: Bridget Roberts, Interim City Manager FROM: Kevin L. Helms, Project Manager Cc: Ben Burchfield, Public Works Director Brandon Ainsworth, Fire Chief DATE: July 10, 2026 SUBJECT: Proposal for Special Inspections Related to Construction of Fire Station #3 Background There are numerous special inspections required throughout th e course of construction. The se inspections extend beyond the scope of services performed by the City’s Building Inspectors and must be conducted by qualified third-party testing agencies. Following the award of the construction contract, the project plans were submitted to UES to prepare a proposal for the required construction materials testing and special inspection services . The initial proposal included s everal inspections that will be performed by the City ’s Building Inspectors . After consultation with Nora Cardin and the engineering representatives from Wold Architects and Engineers, the City requested that those inspections be removed from the proposal. The attached revised proposal reflects this reduced scope of work. Multiple proposals were not requested because UES previously performed the geotechnical investigation for the project site and is already familiar with the subsurface conditions. The firm conducted the geotechnical testing before the City purchased the property to evaluate its suitability for construction of the proposed fire station. Maintaining continuity with the same firm is expected to improve coordination and efficiency throughout construction. The proposed fee of $48,475 is an estimated total based on the anticipated scope of services. Individual testing and inspection services are itemized within the fee schedule and the Opinion of Pro bable Cost, and the City will only be billed for the services actually pe rformed during construction at the unit rates identified in the proposal. Recent proposals for similar services on other projects have not ex ceeded the threshold requiring City Council approval, which is why Councilmembers may not recall approving similar agreements in the past. Due to the size and complexity of the Fire Station #3 project, combined with increases in the cost of testing and inspection services, this proposal exceeds that approval threshold. 67