2023 6 20 City Council Agenda Packet
City Council · packet · 104 pages · Descriptive metadata inferred from filename
Extracted text for page 71
Machine-read OCR text; verify every number, name, and layout against the original page.
PUBLIC WORKS Asummary of the options available are: Base Bid Gray $846,824 + 10% Contingency of $84,682 $931,506? Alternate #1 Orange S 87,860 + 5% Contingency of $ 4,393 S 92,253 Alternate #2 Green $174,262 + 5% Contingency of S 8,713 $182,9757 Alternate #3 —- Blue $112,440 + 5% Contingency of S$ 5,620 5118,060 Alternate #4 Purple $462,145 + 10% Contingency of $46,215 $508,360" 1a larger contingency amount has been specified for the Base Bid and Alternate #4 because there are more uncertainties with these two portions of the project, especially as it relates to soil suitability for constructing this type of facility. 2Since the Recreation Advisory Committee met, staff and the architect have identified an option which would allow Alternates #2 to proceed at a significantly reduced cost. We obtained data from the lighting manufacturer regarding both the cost of materials for each of the three components of this project which includes lighting as well as what their cost would be to do a turnkey job if the City procured the services with the lighting manufacturer through a purchasing cooperative. If we chose not to award alternate #2 to Baseline and instead procured this item from the manufacturer through the Sourcewell Purchasing Cooperative, the cost would decrease to $125,000 versus the bid price of $174,262. Using this option, the City would save $50,000 on the conversion of the existing tennis court lighting to new LED light fixtures. 69