2022 03 15 City Council
City Council · packet · 55 pages · Descriptive metadata inferred from filename
Extracted text for page 27
Unverified text extraction. Check the original page for numbers, names, and layout.
PUBLIC WORKS TO: C. Seth Sumner, City Manager FROM: Kevin Helms, Project Manager Cc: Ben Burchfield, Public Works Director DATE: March 10, 2022 SUBJECT: Wayfinding Signs As you are aware, Hacker Sign was the only company to submit a valid proposal in response to our recent Request For Proposals regarding wayfinding signage . On March 9th I was contacted by a representative from Hacker Sign who indicated they were working on pricing for the City’s updated design but were having issues with the project. The problem revolves around the typical timeframe between when the City requests items to be submitted for the City Council agenda and when the matter is voted upon by City Council. A project such as this would historically be quoted with a price guarantee of at least 30 days. In today’s environment manufacturers are not willing to guarantee prices for more than five to ten days. Hacker Sign was inquiring as to the shortest timeframe the City could accept between pricing and consideration for approval. Their three suppliers were all limiting the pricing to five days. Mr. Hacker indicated he thought he could get a short extension, but it probably would be only a few extra days. Earlier today I spoke with Mr. Hacker and he stated he could supply us pricing later today which would be valid until the City Council meeting next week . To my surprise he also had one supplier who had the material in stock and was willing to hold it for him if we could work within this tim eframe. In this environment, I expected the supply time to be at least eight weeks. Delaying consideration of this matter until next month wouldn’t resolve the issue at hand, because we still would not be able to obtain pricing which would be valid for more than five days. Delaying the decision also risks a significant price increase based upon the dramatic rise in fuel prices over have risen the past week. We would also risk losing access to the materials in stoc k, potentially creating a lengthy delay for the project. While I realize this is an inconvenience to the elected officials and city staff, the only other alternative at this time would seem to be to wait and approve the project with a not to exceed budget amount, which may or may not be enough to allow us to move forward once the pricing is updated. Otherwise, we would likely have to delay the project for the foreseeable future until the current volatility and supply chain issues are resolved. If you need any additional information, do not hesitate to contact me. 25