2023 09 19 City Council Packet
City Council · packet · 131 pages · Descriptive metadata inferred from filename
Extracted text for page 77
Unverified text extraction. Check the original page for numbers, names, and layout.
o bservations or measurements. Limited adjustments may be made to model inputs to better approximate real-world observations. 4.5 – Identification of Issues to be Addressed In this task, the validated models will be simulated for the selected wet weather events to evaluate system flows contributing to water quality issues. This analysis may be staggered for different drainage subsys tems as needed to expedite the evaluation of priority areas identified by Owner. Hydraulic results from design storms will be reviewed at the drainage issue locations identified by Owner with field observations to assess potential factors and flow characteristics contributing to water quality issues. A broader review of model results will then be performed to identify similar factors that could lead to similar issues at other locations. Engineer will meet with Owner to discuss identified issues and potential contributing factors . A key goal of the discussion will be to select which issues should be prioritized for the development of conceptual solutions. Considerations include the severit y of the issue , its proximity to nearby issues, and the potential impacts on MS4 compliance and public safety . The discussion will also include potential types of solutions to be evaluated . Examples include detention or green infrastructure within upstream urbanized areas to reduce flows to stream channels, stream bank stabilization or erosion control improvements, and gray infrastructure improvements. 4.6 – Hydraulic Analysis of Stormwater Improvements Engineer will utilize the hydraulic models as a tool for evaluating conceptual solutions to the issues selected in the previous task. Upstream solutions such as detention or green infrastructure will be evaluated within the closed system model. Additional in-stream improvements may be incorporated into the stream system model. Alternatives will initially be sized based on a high -level review of site constraints (such as maximizing detention within space available) and then finetuned in the model to hit defined goals or thresholds such as reduced flows and velocities. After accounting for upstream and in-stream improvements, the stream 75