2022 06 21 City Council
City Council · packet · 304 pages · Descriptive metadata inferred from filename
Extracted text for page 235
Unverified text extraction. Check the original page for numbers, names, and layout.
16
On-line Survey
The city facilitated an on-line survey from September 16 to November 19, 2021, approximately 322
residents participated.
The survey was first promoted via card inserts within utility bills for residents. The Athens Utilities Board
worked with their third-party bill stuffer, Pinnacle Data Systems, to print and stuff the survey invites within
their bill envelopes. The survey was hosted o n the city’s website at www.athenstn.gov/survey u sing a
Microsoft Forms application to record participant responses. The intent of using the AUB billing cycle was
to ensure that as many Athenians were notified of the opportunity to participate, including those who
resided in apartment complexes. If anyone resided in Athens and paid a utility bill, they would receive an
invite. The survey was also promoted via social media in another attempt to reach as many residents as
possible. The only limitation being that not everyone in the community used social media. The third
promotion was a collaboration with the regional newspaper , t he Daily Post -Athenian, to employ
geofenced advertisements, and targeted emails to their subscribers. The original deadline was for October
28th but upon discovering that the utilities billing cycle had different sectors whereupon resident received
their invites later than others , including just days before the deadline, it was decided to extend the
deadline an additional couple of weeks to November 19, 2021, to ensure everyone that received an invite
had ample time to answer the six sections of questions.
A summary of the findings from the interviews and focus groups a nd the online survey is below,
followed by a copy of the PPT presentation shared with City Council.
City of Athens - Public Engagement and Needs Assessment Strategy with Online Survey
CITY COUNCIL
SUMMIT
VALUES
SENIOR STAFF
WORKSHOP
(10 Participants,
Unanimous)
STAKEHOLDER FOCUS GROUP VISIONS
(100 Participants, Highlighted Items
Designate Top Priorities for Comparison)
SURVEY
(322 Participants)
1. HIGH QUALITY OF
LIFE
1st Priority – Attract
More Shops,
Restaurants, Residents,
and Visitors to
Downtown
4th Priority – Expand the
Sidewalk, Bikeways, and
Trails System
5
th Priority – Improve
Marketing &
Communications to
• Create
neighborhood
connectivity
• Sense of
community
• Multi-modal
connectivity
• Connected trails system (building on
Eureka Trail), bike lanes, trails, sidewalks,
walkability, including for young people
and college students (IIIII II)
• Continue to
expand access to
recreation,
cultural, and
social programs
• More
opportunities,
activities, family
things to do
• Attract new
residents and
businesses
because of high
quality of life
• Opportunities to do things within
community, more things to do for young
people, seniors (IIII)
• Boys & Girls Club (II)
• Parks II
• Summer camps
• Improved regional park including turf on
fields
233