2026 9 8 Work Session Packet council Redacted
City Council · packet · 50 pages · Descriptive metadata inferred from filename
Extracted text for page 4
Unverified text extraction. Check the original page for numbers, names, and layout.
PUBLIC WORKS was going to cost more than originally projected, I inquired about the process for requesting a share of the funds returned by others. Apparently, the process for requesting these funds was still a work in p rogress. However, I continued to work with the grant administrators to pursue the additional funds while detailing the various additional expenses our project had incurred. This process took about six weeks, but I was ultimately notified that we had been awarded an additional $ 321,563.10, which required an additional 15% local match. This brought the total project budget to $3,097,485.76 , of which $404, 019.89 is local funding. Council has already approved the bulk of these addition al ex penses through agreements with Gresham Smith for professional services related to the project. By obtaining these additional funds, the City’s additional share was reduced from over $250,000 to the required additional local match of about $50,000. The City Council needs to authorize the expenditure of these funds through an amend ment to the agreement with Wilson Construction Group . The new contract total being presented for approval is $2,244,885.69. The only construction-related expense that has yet to be finalized is the paving repairs at Regional Park, but this total includes an amount based upon unit prices and estimated quantities . The Wilson Construction Group contract amendment, combined with adjustments to other expenses that are less than originally budgeted and the additional grant funds received, brings the total estimated project cost to $3,102,041.00. Because this amount exceeds the total available project fun ding, the City will be responsible for the excess amount of $4,555.24, in addition to the required 15% local match, for a total estimated local contribution of $408,575.13. If the paving costs are less than anticipated, the amount of the City’s additional contribution will be reduced accordingly. Given that there was no co ntingency initially approved for this project, the additional funds being requested are well within the typical contingency allocation for a project such as this , which would generally range between 10% and 20% of the initial project cost. Action Item Approve an amendment to the agreement with Wilson Construction Group , increasing the contract amount by $213,330.70 to a new total of $2,244,885.69. 2